• Home
  • AV/E-Texts
  • History
  • Icons/Fansites
  • Links
  • Novels
  • Original Sources and 19th C. Texts
  • Podcasts
  • Social Customs During The Regency Era
  • Teacher/Student
  • Writer and Literature Resources

Jane Austen's World

This Jane Austen blog brings Jane Austen, her novels, and the Regency Period alive through food, dress, social customs, and other 19th C. historical details related to this topic.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« If Walls Could Talk: An Intimate History of the Home, Lucy Worsley
Translating Austen: Meeting with Gillian Dow of Chawton House Library and Southampton University »

Great Expectations 2011: Gillian Anderson’s Miss Havisham

April 10, 2012 by Vic

Young Pip (Oscar Kennedy) visits Satis House (Holdenby House's courtyard transformed digitally by Triad Digital).

One of the most polarizing aspects of Great Expectations 2011 is Gillian Anderson’s portrayal of Miss Havisham. Many people loved it; as many hated it.

At 43 years of age, some critics regard the actress as being too young for the part. Yet Martita Hunt played Miss Havisham in David Lean’s classic when she was 47, only fours years older than Gillian. Helena Bonham Carter is set to play Miss Havisham in a new theatrical film version coming out later this year. She will soon be 44 years old.

Others find Gillian Anderson’s take on Miss Havisham to be all wrong. I agree with the critic who wrote that regardless of how one feels about the actress as Miss Havisham, she dominates her scenes as the jilted bride. Paired with the CG changes made to Holdenby House to transform it into Satis House, the viewer is treated to one of the creepier interpretations of Miss Havisham in her rotting manse.

Stone angel in courtyard strangled by vines.

The film sets up Pip’s first meeting with Miss Havisham and Estella by transforming the courtyard into a dark, vine-strangled environment. This alone should tell Pip that all is not right with his new patron.

Transformed courtyard.

Miss Havisham glides down the stairs like a ghostly apparition.

In this adaptation, Pip’s first glimpse of Miss Havisham is of her gliding down the stairs in a candle-lit, dark oak stairwell. A break in the curtain backlights her figure and features. Not a word is said. In the novel, Pip has heard that Miss Havisham is an immensely rich and grim lady who led a life of seclusion.

The stairs are covered with dust and candles are fully ablaze despite the day light.

Miss Havisham as an eerie apparition is enhanced in this scene in which her white figure is indistinct and as fuzzy as the dust on the stairs.

When she discovered that her bridegroom-to-be had absconded with her money and her heart, Miss Havisham was at her dressing table putting on her bridal clothes. She had put on one shoe, her other foot was stockinged. Gillian Anderson is seen walking barefoot, a change in Dickens’ story that I found perplexing. In fact, many of the changes in both plot, scenes, and costumes seemed odd.

Surely the dress would have been yellower and more ragged and tattered after having been worn for so long?

While I enjoyed Gillian Anderson’s reworking of Miss Havisham into a neurotic recluse with a tendency towards self-mutilation, I wondered at the decision to make her appear like a mini-me version of Bette Davis’s Baby Jane. Her wedding gown, I suppose, was meant to look like a Regency version of a bridal dress, but to my way of thinking it resembled a nightie. Her curls, which were not supposed to have been touched in years, hung tight around her face. By the time Pip met her, her white hair would have looked like a rat’s nest.  The delicate fabric of her gown remained remarkably intact – it should have been frayed, especially at the edges and where she sat. She was not wearing a veil, which should have been attached askew on her head. And her train would  have been tattered and filthy, and had an ombre look about it, going from black at the floor to dark gray, to lighter grey until it met the yellowing white color of the gown higher up.

One way to assess if the changes were beneficial is to turn to Dickens’ own words:

In Dickens' great tale, Pip met Miss Havisham as she sat near her dressing table.

However the only thing to be done being to knock at the door. I knocked and was told from within to enter. I entered therefore and found myself in a pretty large room well lighted with wax candle.s No glimpse of daylight was to be seen in it. It was a dressing room as I supposed from the furniture though much of it was of forms and uses then quite unknown to me. But prominent in it was a draped table with a gilded looking glass, and that I made out at first sight to be a fine lady’s dressing table.”

In this film, Miss Havisham walks Pip through a room filled with dusty glass dome-covered scientific specimens that her dead brother had collected from exotic places, much as a docent would accompany a visitor through a musty science museum.

Dead specimens under dusty glass.

Pip’s actual first impression of Miss Havisham after walking through a dark house was much more powerful and immediate:

In an armchair with an elbow resting on the table and her head leaning on that hand sat the strangest lady I have ever seen or shall ever see.”

Once beautiful butterflies pinned into a frozen position, a rather obvious visual simile.

Dickens gave the costume and set designers a plethora of descriptions to work with:

She was dressed in rich materials, satins and lace and silks, all of white. Her shoes were white. And she had a long white veil dependent from her hair; and she had bridal flowers in her hair, but her hair was white. Some bright jewels sparkled on her neck, and on her hands, and some other jewels lay sparkling on the table. Dresses less splendid than the dress she wore, and half packed trunks, were scattered about. She had not quite finished dressing, for she had but one shoe on, the other was on the table near her hand; her veil was but half arranged, her watch and chain were not put on, and some lace for her bosom lay with those trinkets, and with her handkerchief; and gloves and some flowers and a prayer book all confusedly heaped about the looking glass.”

Gillian Anderson's lips are as parched as dry paper, but the curls are too neat for someone who has not tended to her hair in decades.

I have no quarrel with Gillian Anderson’s age. The book is written through Pip’s eyes, and a young boy would have found anyone in their 40′s to be ancient. Gillian did an excellent job of resembling someone who had not seen sunlight in decades, and whose physical condition was deteriorating as a result of physical and emotional neglect. Her curls make her look much too young and are incongruent. Why would she take care to wear such beautiful curls when she has neglected everything else about her appearance?

Helena Bonham Carter plays Miss Havisham in the yet to be released Great Expectations

If viewers were turned off by Gillian’s creepy Miss Havisham, with her high-pitched little girl voice and nervous bird-like mannerisms, then the above photo indicates that Helena Bonham Carter’s take on the spinster is set to go over the top as well. Let’s go back to Dickens’ description of Pip’s first meeting with his new patron to see if these interpretations fit in with his vision of the jilted bride:

It was not in the first minute that I saw all these things, though I saw more of them in the first minute than might be supposed. But I saw that every thing within my view, which ought to be white, had been white long ago, and had lost its lustre, and was faded and yellow. I saw that the bride within the bridal dress had withered like the dress, and, like the flowers, and had no brightness left, but the brightness of her sunken eyes.  I saw that the dress had been put upon the rounded figure of a young woman, and that the figure upon which it now hung loose had shrunk to skin and bone. “

Miss Havisham was a skeletal, withered shadow of a woman who shone as dimly as a pale moon hidden behind clouds. Gillian’s Miss Havisham shines just a little too brightly.

Pip approaches Estella for the first time.

It was when I stood before her avoiding her eyes that I took note of the surrounding objects in detail, and saw that her watch had stopped at twenty minutes to nine, and that a clock in the room had stopped at twenty minutes to nine.”

For some strange reason, the clocks in the film had stopped at 11:00. It’s these minor inattentions to detail that grate.

Izzy Meikle-Small plays the haughty young Estella.

“Look at me”, said Miss Havisham. “You are not afraid of a woman who has never seen the sun since you were born.”

These words would have been much more powerful in the introductory scene than Gillian’s museum tour guide of her rooms.

David Lean's Great Expectations featured a rather mature Jean Simmons. Martita Hunt as Miss Havisham and Tony Wager as Pip.

David Lean’s set was dark, as described by Dickens. Too much sunlight was allowed inside the house Gillian Anderson’s Miss Havisham inhabited. This served to make Satis House look much dirtier but less creepy.

I find it remarkable that many critics found this adaptation visually too gloomy. I think there is too much light. Dickens described the curtains as emitting no light whatsoever.

I glanced down at the foot from which the shoe was absent, and saw that the silk stocking on it once, while now yellow, had been trodden ragged. Without this arrest of every thing, this standing still of all the pale decayed objects, not even the withered bridal dress on the collapsed form could have looked so like grave clothes, or the long veil so like a shroud.

So she sat corpse like as we played at cards; the frillings and trimmings on her bridal dress looking like earthy paper, as if they would crumble under a touch. I knew nothing then of the discoveries that are occasionally made of bodies buried in ancient times which fall to powder in the moment of being distinctly seen, but I have often thought since that she must have looked as if the admission of the natural light of day would have struck her to dust”

The above description tells us why it would have been more important for the set designer to have kept Miss Havisham in total darkness. While some of the effects of the light on the dust and dirt was striking, the only evidence of “earthy paper” was on Gillian Anderson’s parched lips.


This set of the decaying bridal banquet is gorgeous. The house itself is allowed to rot (and Pip begins to notice the water damage and crumbling walls as he matures), much as Miss Havisham is allowing herself to rot inside and out. There were moments when the production shone. The film’s colors follow the current trend for digital color correction to create atmosphere. Whether you like it or not, I’m afraid the trend is here to stay.

The wedding cake looked skeletal and creepy, as if bugs were ready to crawl out of it. Still, would so much of the food and flowers have remained recognizable?

Miss Havisham's self-mutilation is evident early on in the film.

The self-mutilation, in this instance, Miss Havisham is constantly scratching her hand, was an interesting touch that added another layer to her manic obsessions. At times she seemed completely insane and incapable of self-possession. In this adaptation, Gillian portrays Miss Havisham as a weak victim who somehow finds the strength of will to plot her revenge on all male-kind.

The letter of betrayal from Compeyson, the fiance who jilted Miss Havisham.

The incongruity of a perfect white veil over the decaying flowers and (finally) the tattered sleeves struck me as being wrong in Gillian’s final scenes. While I loved the cinematography of the exterior sets, these visual mistakes detracted from my enjoyment of the story. One other thought: while I enjoyed watching the young Pip and Estella, I was bothered by their older counterparts. It was very hard for me to swallow that Pip was more beautiful than the girl he loved.

Vanessa Kirby as Estella and Douglas Booth as Pip

Your thoughts?

You can watch Great Expectations online through May 8th on PBSs website.

About these ads

Share with others:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in 19th Century England, Jane Austen's World, Movie review, Popular culture, Victorian Era | Tagged Charles Dickens, Douglas Booth, Gillian Anderson, Great Expectations, Great Expectations 2011, Miss Havisham, Oscar Kennedy, Vanessa Kirby | 32 Comments

32 Responses

  1. on April 10, 2012 at 10:38 G.Fisher

    This rendition of Great Expectations needs to be shelved – forever. If there are
    further adaptations they will, surely,veer from Dicken’s work so that they will become nothing more than……….


  2. on April 10, 2012 at 11:20 unpub

    I doubt that anyone will ever match David Lean’s screen adaptations of Dickens.
    That said I enjoyed this interpretation and particularly Gillian Anderson’s role in it.


  3. on April 10, 2012 at 11:46 Karen

    I enjoyed Anderson’s performance, as well, but I agree the costuming, etc was mishandled. Another thing to add about the hair… there was too much of it! Sunlight deprivation for such an extended period of time would have caused a lot to fall out. I think perhaps the reasoning might have been while that tattered approach reads well in a book, it’s just too overwhelming on film.


  4. on April 10, 2012 at 11:51 Harry Birkenhead

    I thought…Can’t we get a more attactive Estella?..To me,she was too plain considering Dickens described as very beautiful… other wise a good adadption.
    The ending..Dickens wrote two… The first where they just parted ways and the third (after a friend of Dickens insisted he do so) leaves then standing together… the reader is allowed to imagine the ending.


  5. on April 10, 2012 at 12:03 Patty

    Vic,

    Gillian’s bare feet annoyed me, too. Surely no one could have survived so long in a drafty, musty old house in bare feet and a flimsy Regency gown, which is

    not satin and silk. I found her performance and appearance like that of a 60′s hippie airhead, but I also didn’t dislike her performance. The self mutilation was idiotic and her acting should alone have conveyed the role.

    What bothered me more was your observation that adult Pip was better looking than adult Estella.

    I think there’s a great deal of corruption in show business and sometimes people are cast who know someone or have an influential relative who donates money to some cause. When I saw the homely adult Estella, I thought immediately that she was given a push to be allowed this role and her acting skills are minimal.

    David Lean is so much better. One reason is the dialog moves light years faster.


  6. on April 10, 2012 at 12:22 Stephen (Steve) Balche

    I sensed the ghost story aspect of this novel for the first time. While some may have liked the horror of the rats/mice in the wedding cake and subtle sadistic personalities of the earlier version, I thought the more redemptive fiery death scene extremely memorable. To see Pip’s change in personality was also rewarding. Just as one should not judge a good book by the first chapter, perhaps this new movie version should be judged by what new light it casts on what Dickens was trying to convey. For me, I will reread the novel to see its ghost story aspects. If I remember correctly, even Dickens rewrote the ending to make it more Hollywood!


  7. on April 10, 2012 at 12:24 stephen

    What a fine article. I agree with all you said but Gilian was wonderful. I couldn’t take me eyes off of her. I would love to someday have Jessica Lange slip into the role.


    • on November 4, 2012 at 14:39 Marie

      Oooooo – Jessica Lange…. AGREED


  8. on April 10, 2012 at 12:44 Christopher J Squire

    Images 1 – 10 GA’s lips don’t work.


  9. on April 10, 2012 at 12:48 Lauren Gilbert

    I love Gillian Anderson as an actress, and (despite the fresh curls, self-mutilation and other flaws mentioned) found a certain merit in her interpretation. (Miss Havisham was rather like a ghost caught in a moment of time and had to be certifiable to live like she did!) However, my main complaint about movies based on books I love is how frequently they stray from the book unnecessarily-the visual details do distract. The change in the stopped clock time to 11:00 is a classic example…


  10. on April 10, 2012 at 14:49 Debra Brown

    I thought Gillian was perfection. Though Dickens wrote Miss Havisham as older, 44 was also a good age, considering her age as a bride and the amount of time it could have taken to acqure and raise Estella. It allowed for an appealingly beautiful Miss Havisham, which, in my opinion, added to the story. The same goes for the color of her gown. While yellowed would have been more realistic, it would not have been as visually appealing. I thought the lighting was perfect, also, despite the straying from the story. In a visual production, it is important for the viewers to be able to see at least a small amount of what is in the room, and candles alone would not have accomlished that well enough. The sheer curtains toned down the daylight in a near-mystical way. So I think that these variations from Dickens and realism needed to be there for effect in a visual production.

    What bothers me in a movie is when it departs from the author’s plot or throws in modern nuances, such as politcal correctness or sexual mores, which were nonexistant at the time.

    It surprises me that so many found Vannessa Kirby as unattractive.


    • on April 11, 2012 at 08:51 Vic

      Hi Debra, I did not find Vanessa Kirby unattractive. With most other actors, her looks would have been fine enough. But Douglas Booth, a former male model for Burberry, has the sort of skin and coloring that every female aspires to achieve with make up. This young man’s features are drop dead gorgeous. His facial features remind me of a Grecian statue’s. What woman, even one who has been raised to despise men, could resist such a beautiful suitor?


  11. on April 10, 2012 at 15:12 moonbridgebooks

    I’m not enamored with this version either. It’s not the Miss Havisham in my mind, and Estella ought to be strikingly pretty to best accomplish what she’s been trained to do. Having a new perspetive is fine, but it still should be realistic (Estella, scene details). Interested in seeing Helena Bonham Carter as Miss Havisham – I like seeing HBC in anything.


  12. on April 10, 2012 at 16:51 Heather Molinari

    Having just read the novel again, it was still very fresh in my mind. It was disappointing to me because I had formed a picture of Miss Havisham as described by Dickens, and Gillian (although a wonderful actress) did not fit. As mentioned above, everything from her gown to her curls were not right, also to me she was not a whimpering weak person, she thrived on the strength of her extreme hatred. I was not happy with the other departures from the novel, I watched with someone who has never read it I found myself explaining that this was not as written so that they did not think it was a true interpretation. I did love the lovely marshes and inside Satis house was amazing,except for the light. As for Estella, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I personally did not feel she was a match with Dickens description. I too look forward to Helena’s interpretation and hopefully a production that will follow the story as Dickens would wish.


  13. on April 10, 2012 at 17:29 Sophy

    This adaptation was ghastly, and not in a good way. Who do these producers, set, costume, and makeup designers think they are to disregard this major author’s description of his characters and their habitat? It is too bad that this adaptation is recorded in a digital format, and not on the old silver nitrate film, which would decompose by itself. This version deserves to be degaussed, along with the horrid Keira Knightley version of Pride and Prejudice.


  14. on April 10, 2012 at 17:37 Barry

    Screen adaptations of classic literature almost always disappoint if one expects a complete and accurate portrayal of the novel down to the most minute details. That’s why there is no substitute to the direct connection established with the author from actually reading the novels. I judge the screenplay more by the quality of the acting and set design, which I think were very well done. I enjoyed this adaptation for its striking visual cinematography, and I think GA played it in the right way. Miss Havisham, in my mind, was both mysterious and creepy in the way she was portrayed, although I pictured her as being older when I read the novel. I thought that David Souchet played the lawyer, Mr. Jaggers, in just the way I pictured him. Dickens always had Jaggers washing his hand after meeting with his clients, which I always found an interesting detail from the novel, however that was not written into the screenplay. I also thought the older Estella not pretty enough.


    • on April 11, 2012 at 09:24 Vic

      Barry, you make some excellent points. We should not expect films to adhere perfectly to novels, for they can set up scenes and characters in a quick, visual way that sometimes would take pages and pages of exposition.

      Overall I enjoyed this production of Great Expectations, and found Suchet’s Mr. Jaggers memorable. Still, if a director and writer are going to take liberties, they should have a good reason for doing so. I first viewed this series back to back in one sitting, unable to take my eyes from the small screen. During my second viewing I became more critical and began to notice some details that just seemed to veer off for no good reason.


      • on April 11, 2012 at 12:40 barrysternberg

        Vic, I don’t mean to criticize, as I really like this and all your blogs. I agree with your observations. To be clear, I don’t mean to say that screen adaptations should disregard the details, or take liberties to suit the director’s own predilections and whims. In fact, I believe the more the screen adaptation adheres to the author’s original vision the better the production. Unfortunately, I just find that watching a screen adaptation never transports me into the author’s world in the same way as reading the prose. I find this especially so with Jane Austen adaptations. The 1995 P&P production was probably the closest because much of the dialogue was taken from the novel. But I can never get the same enjoyment from watching the adaptations of Jane Austen’s work as I do when reading the words that spill out from her pen directly to me.


  15. on April 11, 2012 at 00:53 diane costanza

    I enjoyed this version very much. I liked Gillian because she was so different than the usual Miss Haversham.


  16. on April 11, 2012 at 03:59 Charlotte

    I saw Vanessa Kirby on stage in Leeds as Rosalind and she was fantastic, unfortunately she didn’t really get to shine as Estella. How do you compare this to the Guffudd/Waddell version?


  17. on April 11, 2012 at 15:11 Karen

    All comments very interesting and well described. I did not enjoy this version at all. I am spoiled by Dickens’ descriptions and dialogue, little of which existed in this production. Also thought the actors “mildly talented”. Estella very unattractive and not believable as a woman irresistable to men, etc., etc. The only character I thought well played was Magwich. I was very disappointed in David Suchet’s performance as Jaggers. Too dark and stiff.

    Well, no one can replace John Mills and Alec Guinness, let’s face facts!

    Really enjoy this blog and loved all the comments. Keep ‘em coming.


  18. on April 15, 2012 at 20:27 Harry

    I am on the side of those who enjoyed Gillian Anderson’s fresh interpretation of Miss Havisham. Perhaps I missed it but I do not see a mention of one of the chief characteristics of her performance, which was her young girl’s voice – as though frozen in that moment of arrested development, along with other coquettish mannerisms suc as the very girlfriend-y way of pressing for the details of Estella’s conquests. She plays Estella as the girl she was at the moment of her rejection, with all her girlish ways now calcified and brittle to the point of being almost ghoulish.
    Brilliant, I think, brilliant.


    • on April 15, 2012 at 21:40 Vic

      Harry, I described her voice as being high-pitched. I think your description is better.


  19. on April 15, 2012 at 20:52 Harry

    . . . and I am among those who found it jarring to have this almost unfairly drop-dead gorgeous Pip paired with this Estella.


  20. on April 17, 2012 at 03:55 bluffkinghal

    Thanks for the review; I had not known about this. I am downloading part 1 now. :D


  21. on April 17, 2012 at 23:20 Regina Silvia

    What disturbed me about the production is the absence of Biddy. To me she is an essential element of Pip’s growing “snobism” and his gradual understanding of how he has lost his moral compass. On another note, I really liked the portrayal of Joe, but again, without Biddy, he seems to be missing the joy in life he so rightly deserves.


  22. on April 20, 2012 at 00:35 Peter

    I know she’s too young.. I know the curls are too perfect… I know.. I know.. but I just loved Gillian. She is with me now for several days. Her power is growing inside me. She is a great diva. She works around limitations and makes fascinating virtues of them. Her need for love from Estella is very deep and the line deliveries in the crucial revelations to Pip are the real thing. Flawless. It’s a real performance and the reason the “Performing Arts” exist. They do not exist to faithfully reproduce novels. They exist to exhibit “performances”.


    • on April 20, 2012 at 04:18 Vic

      That is why her performance stays with me as well. Her Miss Havisham is unforgettable. What I like is that Gillian DARES……


  23. on April 27, 2012 at 10:21 polly

    Very interesting to read the varied opinions about this production. I too was disappointed in it overall, especially as it started well with excellent actors playing Joe, the hateful Mrs Joe, and young Pip. I agree that the actors playing the adult Estella and Pip are mismatched, but think it is unfair to call Vanessa Kirby ‘homely’ as some others have done. She is attractive, but it is an earthy sort of attractiveness, and she does not convincingly play the haughty, fascinating doll she is supposed to be. Douglas Booth does not look like someone who was brought up to be a blacksmith, and his acting is dull. The greatest disappointment is Miss Havisham. Gillian Anderson is a rather weak actress and entirely fails to convey the humiliation, rage and spite that fuel Miss Havisham’s cruelty. (I suspect that Helena Bonham Carter will do much better.) The conflagration scene was utterly insipid when it should have evoked horror and pity, but by then I had pretty nearly lost interest.


    • on August 6, 2012 at 02:19 Brandi

      Gillian Anderson is one of the strongest actors of our time (or any, really). Her versatility is difficult to match, as is her willingness to, as Vic put it, be daring. I suppose it’s too much to expect that everyone appreciate subtlety, rather than in-your-face, prepackaged emotion.


  24. on May 26, 2012 at 01:09 Image Slider « Summer Gidget

    [...] Image 1 [...]


  25. on May 30, 2012 at 14:13 belac77

    Good review. I must admit, even though I recognize that there have been many changes from the original book, I still love this adaption. :)



Comments are closed.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 3,076 other followers

  • Notice: Comments

    Due to problems with SPAM, I will no longer accept comments on posts that I published over 30 days ago.

    I regret having to take this action.

  • Blog Stats

    • 6,237,680 hits
  • Pin It!

    Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Downton Abbey Season 3 Articles

    untitled

    Click on banner image to see this season's schedule

    SEASON THREE ARTICLES

    ~ Review of Episode 6: Oh, how the mighty have fallen

    ~ Review of Episode 5: The Earl's Gone Off His Rocker and Book Giveaway

    ~ Beauty Lessons Learned from Downton Abbey

    ~ Review of Episode 4: Let the grieving begin '

    ~ Review of Episode 3: Not Enough Noses Out of Joint

    ~ Review of Episode 2: Being Tested Only Makes You Stronger

    ~ Say Yes to the Dress, Episode 2 Poll

    ~ Review of Episode One: The Mouse that Roared

    ~ 1920s Fashions

  • Downton Abbey Season 2 Articles

    Click on the banner to go to PBS Masterpiece Classic

    SEASON TWO ARTICLES

    ~ Watch Downton Abbey Season 2 Online

    ~ Viewers of Downton Abbey Season 2: How Did You Like the Christmas Ending?

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2 Finale:Tonight you're mine completely

    ~ Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey

    ~ The Flu Pandemic in Downton Abbey

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2:Teagowns and Relaxation

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2 Review:Coupling

    ~ Downton Abbey: Preview of Season 2

    ~ The Symbolism of the White Feathers

    ~ World War One Guide to Rats, Shell Shock, and Barbed Wire

    ~ Country houses in medical service

  • Downton Abbey Season One Posts on this blog

    Click on image to enter PBS's site.

    READ THIS BLOG'S ARTICLES ABOUT DOWNTON ABBEY:

    • ~ Watch Downton Abbey Online
    • ~ Downton Abbey: Preview of Season 2
    • ~ Entertaining visitors in an English country house, such as Downton Abbey
    • ~ Downstairs in Downton Abbey: The Servants
    • ~ Upstairs in Downton Abbey: The Three Crawley Sisters
    • ~ The Jane Austen Connection to Downton Abbey and Egypt
    • ~ Downton Abbey's Recycled Costumes
    • ~ Everything You Wanted to Know About the Entail in Downton Abbey, and More
    • ~ The Foxhunt: From Downton Abbey Back to Its Origins
    • ~ The Servants Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • ~ Would You Care for Weak Tea or Strong Tea? How the Dowager Countess of Grantham Served Tea to Her Guests
    • ~ The Duties of a Valet
  • The Obituary of Charlotte Collins by Andrew Capes

    Click on image to read the story.

  • Bookmark

    Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to MySpaceAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter
  • Links to Jane Austen Blogs

    Please note my new links page. I have moved the blog roll and links to other Jane Austen and related topic - including Regency fashion, historic foods, Jane Austen societies, British sites, related topics, and more - to the top of the blog. Click on image.
  • Find Jane Austen on Google

  • Tweet
  • Jane Austen Today, My Other Blog

  • Randolph Macon Talk

    The Marriage Mart
  • This blog has no commercial purpose

    Any ads you see are placed here by Wordpress. I make no profit off my blog. I do receive books and DVDs for review.
  • Jane Austen’s Advice for Writers

    Click on image to read the article.
  • Doctors and Medical Care in the Regency Era

    Click on image.
  • Join Me on Twitter

  • Twitter Updates

    • Jane Austen streaming. My thoughts on a few of my least favorite scenes in these movie adaptations. #JaneAusten janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/str… 59 minutes ago
  • Join me on Facebook

    Vic Sanborn

    Create Your Badge
  • Hello, my name is Vic and I live in Richmond, VA. I work in program and professional development at Virginia Commonwealth University, and I have adored Jane Austen almost all of my life. I am a proud lifetime member of the Jane Austen Society of America. This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. I do not accept any form of cash advertising, sponsorship, or paid topic insertions. However, I do accept and keep books, DVDs and CDs to review.

    Contributors to this blog include: Tony Grant and Shelley DeWees.

    If you would like to share a new site, or point out an error, please email me. (Yes, I am fallible. I'll own up to my mistakes and will make the corrections with a polite smile on my face.) Write me at

    Spam protecting image courtesy: Nexodyne.com

    Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.

  • Copyright Statement

    © Vic Sanborn and Jane Austen's World, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Vic Sanborn and Jane Austen's World with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
  • Regency Fashion: Ladies Outerwear and Shawls

    Click on the image.
  • Colors of 19th Century Wedding Dresses

    Click on image

  • Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
  • The Distinctions of Regency Dress: Undress, Half Dress, Full Dress and Their Meaning

    Click on the image to read the article.
  • Recent Posts

    • Streaming Jane Austen
    • Pride and Prejudice: Having a Ball at Chawton House
    • Nothing As it Seems – Jane Austen in Bath
    • The College of William and Mary, A Sir Christopher Wren Building in Williamsburg, Virginia?
    • The Bathing Dress: Fashion in the Georgian Era
  • Tags

    Bath Beau Brummell Cassandra Austen Charles Dickens Chawton House Cookery Downton Abbey Downton Abbey Season 3 Elizabeth Bennet embarking on a Course of Study Emma Emma 2009 Georgette Heyer Georgette Heyer Book Reviews Holidays jane austen Jane Austen's family Jane Austen's World jane austen blogs Jane Austen Book review Jane Austen Movies Kate Beckinsale Laurie Viera Rigler London Lori Smith Masterpiece Classic Mr. Darcy PBS Masterpiece Classic PBS Masterpiece Mystery! PBS Movie Adaptation PBS Movie Review Pride and Prejudice Prince Regent Regency Bath Regency Dandy regency dress Regency Fashion Regency food Regency London Regency Servants Regency Transportation Romola Garai SourceBooks Tony Grant Working class
  • Ad Disclaimer

    Any ads that appear on this site were placed there by WordPress. I do not make money off this blog. WordPress keeps the revenue. - Vic
  • Pages

    • AV/E-Texts
      • A Proposal To Cicely, by Georgette Heyer
    • History
    • Icons/Fansites
    • Links
    • Novels
    • Original Sources and 19th C. Texts
    • Podcasts
    • Social Customs During The Regency Era
      • English Culture, 1660-1830
    • Teacher/Student
    • Writer and Literature Resources
  • Petticoats in the Regency Era

    Click on image.
  • Jane Austen’s Writing Desk and Writing Table

    The little round writing table at Chawton.

    Click on image to read this fascinating article.

  • Top Posts

    • Social Customs During The Regency Era
    • Pride and Prejudice: Having a Ball at Chawton House
    • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
    • Streaming Jane Austen
    • Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband
    • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • Review: Downton Abbey Season 3, Final Episode, or Bloody Hell! Why did Fellowes do it again?
    • Everything You Wanted to Know About the Entail in Downton Abbey, and More
    • Downstairs in Downton Abbey: The Servants
    • Social Classes in England, 1814
  • Geo Visitors Map
    Add to Technorati Favorites
    Cultural Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
    Blog Flux Local - Virginia
  • cool hit counter
  • The Animal Rescue Site
  • Archives

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
  • Irresistible Attraction

    An online Regency novel in serialized form. Click here to read a new chapter of Irresistible Attraction each week, and follow the story of Amanda Sinclair and James Cavendish, the Earl of Downsley.
  • My Regency Tea Cup Review Ratings

    • Five Regency tea cups: The book is not perfect (few books are), but it was well worth its purchase and possesses many outstanding qualities that makes it stand head and shoulders above its counterparts.
    • Four Regency tea cups: This book offered many hours of pleasant reading, and I found I could not put it down.
    • Three Regency tea cups: Damned with faint praise. I put the book down often, but was intrigued enough to finish it. In this instance, the movie might be better.
    • Two Regency tea cups: This book required major changes that the author and editor should have fixed before publishing deadline.
    • One Regency tea cup: Oh dear. I do so feel for the trees that sacrificed their lives for this verbal garbage.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,076 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: