• Home
  • AV/E-Texts
  • History
  • Icons/Fansites
  • Links
  • Novels
  • Original Sources and 19th C. Texts
  • Podcasts
  • Social Customs During The Regency Era
  • Teacher/Student
  • Writer and Literature Resources

Jane Austen's World

This Jane Austen blog brings Jane Austen, her novels, and the Regency Period alive through food, dress, social customs, and other 19th C. historical details related to this topic.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Seen Over the Ether: Women’s Hairstyles and Clothing in Period Films
Little Dorrit: The Father of the Marshalsea – The Prison Within the Prisoner »

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Review of a High Concept Parody

April 4, 2009 by Vic

pride_prejudice_zombies1wI read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and it made me chuckle, but purists will vomit from the moment they read the opening line: “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains will be in want of more brains.” If ever a classic was treated with tongue in cheek irreverence, author Seth Grahame-Smith managed to do it. Oh, I imagine that the coldly calculated jingle of cash was also a great motivator. After all, Seth allowed Jane Austen to do the bulk of the writing (85% of the text is hers) and she had already plotted the basic outline of the book. To give him his due, he’s given her half the credit, although he and his publisher will be raking in all the profits of this high concept book.

So what’s all the fuss about and why are film studios fighting over film rights to this story? Well, long ago in the island of Britain a zombie plague threatened its inhabitants. Thankfully, zombies are slow moving, dead, and stupid, else they would have overwhelmed the English population, decimating the land. The longer zombies have been dead, the less recognizable as humans they become, having lost eyes and limbs and patches of skin, and wearing clothes that are rotten and in tatters. Some zombies are so gross in both looks and eating habits that they cause the observer to vomit, The merest scratch from a zombie will turn a human into one, as poor Charlotte Collins discovers. A comic character rather than a tragic one, her tongue and mouth degenerate early on, causing Charlotte to lisp and talk like, well, a zombie. The thing is, nobody but Elizabeth notices. Hah! In the land of the dead and stupid, even the living are stupid. This plague has been threatening England for at least a generation, but people are still dumb enough to sit near windows at Assembly Balls where zombies can get at them and scoop out their brains, or open doors and windows in steamy kitchens, as the cooks did at Netherfield Park, so that those who were making dinner BECAME dinner.

1233091511zombies_spread

The Bennet family lives in an age when they must be ever vigilant if the girls are to survive until marriage and beyond. Mr. Bennet ships his girls off to China to learn the fine art of fighting zombies with sword and knife. Elizabeth Bennet becomes an especially talented fighter, and is renowned for the ease with which she can fend off an entire horde of zombies, slicing and dicing with the best of them. She had to do just that when she walked three miles to Netherfield Park to check on her ill sister, Jane. A skeptical Lady Catherine de Bourgh tests her mettle by siccing her Ninja Warriors on her at Rosings, but Elizabeth dispatches them so quickly that she nary raises a sweat. Mr. Darcy is a fine zombie slayer as well, but the Bingley sisters can’t even carry a sword or knife. You get the drift. In Seth’s book, if you’re a poor zombie slayer you are either the villain or your brain is toast. The entire book is a satire, from the inclusion of the gross but well-drawn illustrations to the suggested book club questions at the end, which are quite clever. You must read this novel with an open mind and maintain a sense of humor or, like the denizens of Meryton when they see a zombie feast on one of their friends, you will upchuck your lunch.

The Bennet Sisters in a perfect pentacle fight formation

The Bennet Sisters in a perfect pentacle fight formation

Seth makes one huge miscalculation in his otherwise spot on satire. Not knowing the workings of the female brain, he makes a mess of Wickham, a bad boy who is secretly admired by over half of Jane’s female fans. While they admit he is a scoundrel, they would not mind having a go at taming this deliciously fun male character. But Seth turns Wickham into a diapered mess of a man, who must be constantly tended after wetting his bed. Not well done, Seth. That’s like forcing Willoughby to drive a donkey cart when you know full well he is a phaeton man. This plot development tells me that Seth wrote the book more for teenage boys and girls, not women.

I predict that Seth Grahame-Smith will become rich and famous from this endeavor. Drat the man for thinking of this high concept first, but there are still five Jane Austen books left to cannibalize and I thought I’d pitch a few ideas of my own. Like Seth’s, my books will be co-written with Jane. I readily admit a desire for earning cold hard cash and that I am willing to prostitute my high ideals in order to obtain the wealth that I think I so richly deserve. Are you reading this blog Quirk Books and Random House? Please tell Dream Works and Universal to hop on over too. My plots are available to the highest bidder, starting at a cool mil and upward. Let the auction begin:

Rosemary’s and Henry Tilney’s Baby – Inspiration: Northanger Abbey and Rosemary’s Baby

The book opens with Catherine Morland feeling she is the luckiest woman alive in England. She has married her Mr. Tilney, who turns out to be as witty in bed as out of it. Better yet, General Tilney died of apoplexy upon hearing that his son was to wed her, and Captain Tilney died in a duel over cheating at cards, making Catherine the mistress of Northanger Abbey. She has spent her days and nights dismantling General Tilney’s improvements, including the Rumford fireplace,  and returning Northanger Abey to its Gothic, spider-webbed origins. One day, Catherine follows the sound of mewling down a long, dark, and dank corridor. Opening a creaking door, she enters a redecorated space that is light and airy and (quelle horreur) modern. Catherine approaches a cradle and peeks inside. She gasps when she sees the baby – a miniature Henry, only with yellow slanted eyes, two horn buds sprouting from its forehead, and cloven feet. Catherine doesn’t know which emotion affects her more: the one of betrayal or disappointment that the nursery has been remodeled in the modern neoclassical style.

Willoughby’s Tell-Tale Heart – Inspiration: Sense and Sensibility and The Tell-Tale Heart

After Willoughby’s rejection, Marianne Dashwood falls ill. When she awakens from her fever, she overhears Willoughby reveal to Elinor that he loves Marianne but that he has no choice but to marry for money. The knowledge pushes the poor girl over the edge. While everyone is asleep, a still weakened Marianne sneaks out of the house, rides to Comb Magnum, creeps into Willoughby’s bedroom and stabs him in the heart as he lies snoring. She cuts out his still beating heart, wanting something of Willoughby to remember him by. Marianne tries to live a normal life and agrees to marry Colonel Brandon. But not once can she take her mind off Willoughby (whose murder goes unsolved), or his heart, which has now shriveled and dessicated to 1/10th its size. Regardless, she still can hear it beating 24/7. Desperate to get away from the sound, Marianne encases the organ in a cement box and buries it under the floorboards in the basement, but the constant thump thump thump of Willoughby’s beating heart drives her wild. Colonel Brandon, not knowing what is wrong with his crazed bride, tries to tempt her with sweetmeats and poetry and lovemaking. One day, a wild-eyed Marianne hands the colonel a small cement box.”There”, she cries out. “There is Willoughby’s beating heart!” Upon opening the box, the colonel sees only a shriveled up prune and has his wife committed.

Dr. Jekyll and Fanny Price – Inspiration: Mansfield Park and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

Angered that Fanny has attracted the attentions of rich Henry Crawford, Mrs. Norris arranges for Dr. Jekyll to create a potion that will turn the sweet girl into a vicious and nasty harridan. Unbeknownst to Dr. Jekyll as he was making the potion, drops of Mrs. Norris’s sweat plopped into the boiling cauldron as she watched him stir it, infusing her evil personality into the liquid. After Fanny drinks some tea (which to her mind was foul and bitter, but which she politely sipped anyway), she feels Mrs. Norris’s anger and spite invade her bloodstream. While she remains sweet and tractable during the day, she turns loathsome at night, waking the servants at all hours to do her bidding, clean every nook and cranny in the house, and muck out the stalls. One by one the staff drop dead from exhaustion or quit, unable to perform double duty without a moment’s rest. While Edmund is turned off by the new Fanny, Henry is enthralled with her transformation, for he had harbored some doubts that she’d be capable of overseeing the staff of his houses. Servants come a dime a dozen, but a capable wife comes only once in a lifetime.

Persuading Moby – Inspiration: Persuasion and Moby Dick

Captain Wentworth and his new bride Anne are sailing the high seas on his fine boat as they ply the waters defending England’s shores from pirates, boot-leggers, and invasions. Anne revels in her life on board ship, loving the rocking motion of both the boat and marital bed. Then one day Captain Wentworth spies a white whale and Anne’s life changes. Her husband becomes obsessed, wanting to hunt the whale down and kill it, for, as he tells his bride, albinos lead a tough life out in the wild. They can’t camouflage their color and hide from danger. “We might as well put the poor creature out of its misery,” he gallantly says. But the whale, whom Anne had secretly named Moby, was not easily persuaded to swim within catching distance. The captain, consumed by his obsession, begins to neglect Anne. After a few weeks of putting up with the Captain’s distraction and lack of amorous advances, Anne decides to take matters into her own hands. She commandeers a rowboat and heads towards the whale, who, not scared of a puny boat with a mere woman in it, stays around long enough to listen. This provides Anne with ample time to persuade Moby to leave under cover of night and go blow his blowhole elsewhere.

Bride of FrankChurchillStein – Inspiration: Emma and Bride of Frankenstein

Jane Fairfax is no longer beautiful, having fallen asleep in her tester bed waiting for Frank to return from a night of gambling, carousing, and drinking. The spark from a sputtering candle ignited the bedsheets, burning the house down and rendering poor Jane lifeless and burnt crisp to the bone. Frank, distraught and feeling guilty for neglecting his long-suffering bride, directs a dissipated priest to unearth Jane from her grave and return her to him by enacting an undead ritual he found in an ancient Egyptian manuscript. Jane does indeed come back to life, but she is not quite herself, looking more like a roasted quail than a human. Angered that Frank yanked her out of Heaven to resume her life of living hell with him, she extracts her revenge with cool and deliberate calculation, murdering all of Frank’s cronies and mistresses. Frank, desperate to undo the spell, discovers to his horror that Jane has killed the priest. Frank sinks into despair knowing his cushy days of debauchery are over for as long as his reconstituted Jane roams the earth.

  • Read the review at Austenprose here.
  • Check Time Magazine’s discussion with Seth Grahame-Smith here.
  • Facebook: Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
About these ads

Share with others:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Book review, jane austen, Jane Austen Novels, Jane Austen's World, Popular culture, Regency Period, Regency World | Tagged flesh eating zombies, Jane Austen and Zombies, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, Seth Grahame-Smith | 40 Comments

40 Responses

  1. on April 4, 2009 at 12:50 Ainsley

    Read only half the review–couldn’t take more than that. My opinion is that the author couldn’t come up with a story worth reading on his own, so he stole Jane’s.

    Won’t be reading this one…That’s for sure. :P


  2. on April 4, 2009 at 12:57 Sandi

    I am DYING, here! Stunning “high concepts” of your own.

    I have a teenage boy and I am thinking he might totally enjoy Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. He’s been teasing me his whole life — and threatening to toss out my multitudinous copies of P&P — but would probably get a big charge out of this.

    He is, after all, fifteen and has books on Zombie Survival in his closet.

    Thank you for the review! :)


  3. on April 4, 2009 at 13:17 Maeri

    Ha, I nearly fell off my bed when I read the plot synopsis of “Persuading Moby”! I actually would read that!


  4. on April 4, 2009 at 17:19 Bobosaur Wrangler

    A friend pointed this out to me a few months ago and I was horrified. I can see how it might be funny or distracting, but really, with only 15% new material how can it possibly read well? Love your concepts though!


  5. on April 5, 2009 at 00:25 Katie

    I actually consider myself a janeite and still, I want to read this. I’m curious, and I love a good laugh! And I can’t stand Wickham, so that’s actually a plus for me! ;)

    and might I add that Willoughby’s Tell-Tale Heart is pure genius? :)


  6. on April 5, 2009 at 11:08 Joanna Waugh

    What wonderful stuff! I have to agree with Katie, I like Willoughby’s Tell-Tale Heart the best. I had tears in my eyes from laughing so hard. Thanks for making an otherwise dreary day brighter!


  7. on April 5, 2009 at 13:50 Vic (Jane Austen's World)

    Thank you all for your compliments. If I’d known these parodies were so much fun to write, I might have started out my career on a different path!


  8. on April 5, 2009 at 19:16 Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Jane Austen Ate My Brain Long Ago: The Sunday Salon Review « Austenprose

    [...] Jane Austen’s World [...]


  9. on April 6, 2009 at 22:51 jennygirl

    I’ll borrow it from the library, and not buy it. Drat him for coming up with the idea indeed! Life is too short not to poke fun at our beloved things.
    Loved your plots. I see some screen plays or ideas in your future.


  10. on April 7, 2009 at 21:00 Sylwia

    I like Rosemary’s and Henry Tilney’s Baby best! I can totally see Catherine’s disappointment at the room remodelling. Bride of FrankChurchillStein seems very much in character as well.


  11. on April 10, 2009 at 00:46 charleybrown

    Count me in as one of those who won’t be picking up the Zombie book…not my cup of tea. But I’m wondering when your stories will be making it to print?? Very entertaining Vic!


  12. on April 22, 2009 at 10:22 Melissa H.

    I think Willoughby’s Tell-Tale Heart is my favorite. ;o) Brilliant!


  13. on May 28, 2009 at 16:47 Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Move over for Lizzie Bennet the Zombie Slayer « Rad Librarian’s Blog

    [...] The blog  ”Jane Austen’s World” has an extensive posting dealing with the book in detail.  You can read it at the link below:  http://janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/pride-and-prejudice-and-zombies-a-review-of-a-high-… [...]


  14. on May 29, 2009 at 08:37 Rad Librarian

    Charlotte Collins is already a Zombie in the “original” text, so no big loss there.


  15. on June 5, 2009 at 08:25 Enid Wilson

    LOL, your stories are much more interesting than Zombie. I’m torn between Willoughby’s Tell-Tale Heart or Persuading Moby. I’ll definitely read them if you write.

    Steamy Darcy


  16. on June 8, 2009 at 17:59 Eric3000

    Thanks for the review, Vic. I was trying to decided if this was worth reading. It sounds entertaining.


  17. on July 18, 2009 at 15:48 Jane Austen’s Legacy: Precious Bits of Ivory Turned Into Monsters « Jane Austen’s World

    [...] Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Review of a High Concept Novel: My review of this best seller is tongue in cheek [...]


  18. on July 30, 2009 at 14:16 BJohnson

    I’ve always enjoyed the delicate gentility of sensibilities of Jane Austen novels (and movies), and was a bit leery of this one. On the one hand, the premise was pretty funny – on the other hand, a good percentage of the book I’ve already read. However, I found it pretty adroitly handled, but the fairly seamless blend of “Pride and Prejudice” and the “Dawn of the Dead” genre, the tongue and cheek handling of the “sorry striken” problem, and the so blithely in-period character opinions about it made for very funny reading. I’d recommend it to anyone who’s willing to entertain a bit of high irreverence and throw their disbelief to the winds for an evening of chuckles.

    And yes, if it was made into a movie, I’d very likely go see it!


  19. on September 3, 2009 at 04:21 Richard Reddaway

    Did everyone just leave their brains at home? Anyone who loves Jane Austen, likes zombies and thinks the mash-up is a pretty clever idea (listen to the Grey Album) DON’T buy this book. Yes, it’s a great idea and it could make a wonderful film, but “a seamless blend”? “In period character opinions”? Seth Grahame-Smith, who couldn’t write his way out of a paper bag, has the sense of humor of a 12 year old – does anyone else remember the game “sausage and mash” in which one substitutes “sausage” for words beginning with “s” and “mash” for “m”? Hilarious. And puerile – lots of jokes about balls – honestly I despaired.

    I gave reading up when the “chipmunk” appeared. Look it up; native to the Americas and Asia.


  20. on September 22, 2009 at 22:55 Caitln

    I was seriously considering buying this book, because I’m a hardcore zombie and horror fan; but when my best friend said that I could borrow her copy, I snatched on the moment.

    I really must say, with my passion for both I thought I’d love it. Unfortunately, however, I’ve gotten only about 4 chapters into it and I can’t stand to even look at it anymore. I really don’t know if I’ll ever pick it back up. It almost feels like a huge insult to Jane Austin’s original.

    Mostly, the biggest issue I had was not so much the extremely altered plot (which I found to be rather…abrupt and random in the time line), but Seth’s horrible attempt to write into the story. His writing style was so far from Austin’s that it just sounded extremely awkward. It’s like saying, “Thou art my truest love. Let’s hook up, okay?” It just…isn’t comprehensive and sounds horrible. If he was going to use the original text, he should have studied up on the language.

    I don’t know…It may just be me, but I’m very disappointed with this book. I have to wonder if Seth even read the book before deciding on writing this…


  21. on October 3, 2009 at 03:28 loblollyboy

    Dull-eyed? Pasty-faced? Wants to eat my brains? Suddenly descends on earth out of another dimension? Boy, does that ever describe the people I work for perfectly. Are you sure this has no counterpart in the modern world, such as ‘Separated at Birth: The Organization Man And Cthulu?’ Wouldn’t surprise me.


  22. on October 6, 2009 at 00:11 Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters: A Review « Jane Austen’s World

    [...] Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Review of a High Concept Parody [...]


  23. on October 7, 2009 at 05:25 Rahotep

    My nephew gave me Pride and Prejudice and Zombies yesterday. I intend to start reading it today … but the blurb and the pictures served to whet my appetite! Can’t wait to see how it all pans out.

    Any book that has ninjas AND zombies in it, deserves the Booker prize!

    I want the rest now!


  24. on October 24, 2009 at 22:36 Sammie

    If you wrote “Persuading Moby”, I’d read it! That’s the closest I’m coming to Moby Dick. (Don’t tell my English teacher.)


  25. on December 3, 2009 at 05:17 amconway

    This sounds quite awesome, actually. I’m definitely going to have to pick up a copy. Thanks for the review!


  26. on December 5, 2009 at 08:31 Adriana Zardini

    Dear Vic,

    the book is available im Brazil now, so readers are tempted to read it. Can I translate parts of your post and publish it in my blog?

    Thanks,

    Adriana Zardini


  27. on January 28, 2010 at 18:15 Alla

    I just finished the book a little over an hour ago and I had mixed feelings. It was funny to have random zombies eating people’s brains, but overall it did not fit it very well. It’s like reading the original and once in a while, “here comes a zombie!” I am disappointed he didn’t take the idea farther. It could have been a very original and funny book, but the author got lazy.


  28. on February 5, 2010 at 00:33 Regency Books in My Review Queue « Jane Austen's World

    [...] Read my review of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies here. [...]


  29. on March 27, 2010 at 13:19 shannon cooper

    i liked the book more than i thought i would i love the originall so this twist put a extra sci-fi twist ont the romance turning it in to a thrilling experiance but still with romance. i guess i liked it because i love the whole concept of the hatred aginst wickham . but still it’s a bokk you must read if you love zombie stories that intwine with the bennet girls.


  30. on April 12, 2010 at 08:56 Mansfield Park and Mummies, Interview with Author Vera Nazarian « Jane Austen's World

    [...] Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: A High Concept Parody [...]


  31. on May 3, 2010 at 17:25 koluis

    I like this content so much.Imagination is more important than knowledge.


  32. on June 12, 2010 at 09:14 Drew

    I read and worked on part of a screen play for Pride and Prejudice at uni and have also read Max Brooks’ World War Z. Both were really good books, but Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is lacking. It’s not satire, it’s not parody, it’s basically a pup conversation (“Wouldn’t it be funny if…”) turned into a book.

    The whole concept becomes stale after the opening line. I’m not a purest, I think that the concept could have worked but I do feel that Grahame-Smith was lazy in his contribution.


  33. on June 18, 2010 at 11:08 More Vikings Book Review Blog » Crossing Genres Part 3: Mashups Reading List

    [...] Review @ Jane Austen’s World [...]


  34. on July 21, 2010 at 12:02 Maria Florencia Borrello

    Dear Everyone,
    My name is María Florencia Borrello, and I am a fully-qualified teacher of English as a Foreign Language from Argentina. At present, I am writing a Postgraduate Dissertation on Jane Austen’s classic, Pride and Prejudice (1813), and Seth Grahame-Smith’s newly released re-writing of the original text, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (2009). Therefore, I am taking the liberty of writing to you for I believe it would be extremely helpful if you could possibly give some advice on this topic, as I gather you specialize in Postcolonialism and Postmodernism.

    As regards my work then, I can tell you that it is framed within a paradigm of analysis that intertwins the fundamental concepts put forward by Postmodern and Postcolonial Studies. The reason for choosing such an interdisciplinary method of analysis is that, even though Postcolonial literary theory serves useful to delve into those literary works which, in some way or other, re-write or reconstruct the classics of the Western Canon, it seems to fall short when analysing Grahame-Smith’s work in particular. Put another way, in spite of theorizing some concepts relevant to the analysis of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, such as the idea of the other as the exotic or the uncanny, Postcolonial literary theory proves insufficient when trying to account for the hidden implications of including the image of the zombie into Austen’s classic narrative.
    Therefore, as Rob Pope explains in The English Studies Book, it is only by bringing theoretical models and critical approaches into a dynamic relationship between one another that readers can derive meaning from texts and shed light on the potentialities of any of them (1998: 81). Hence, Postmodern theory –with its paramount concepts of pastiche and parody– seems to provide for the missing tool necessary to achieve a more thorough analysis of Grahame-Smith’s novel.
    Yet, the adoption of such a combined analyses that would just draw upon both of the aforementioned literary theories to explore Pride and Prejudice and Zombies would still be leaving aside an essential layer of signification that demands argumentation: the key reason for the choice of supernatural phenomena, mainly represented by the zombies, above all other things. Consequently, my paper sets out to substantiate the imperative need to explore the hallmarks of Gothic fiction in order to be able to account for the gestalt of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, the key implications of including the image of the zombie into the original story, and its subsequent genre change.
    Nevertheless, I am afraid of making a hasty generalization for I may unconsciously lack the necessary theoretical background to properly account for my statements. Therefore, if it is not too much to ask, I would really appreciate it if you could please provide me with your feedback on my reasearch.

    Thank you very much in advance and I do apologise for taking the liberty of writing to you and taking up your time.

    Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

    Yours faithfully,
    María Florencia Borrello
    (florborrello@hotmail.com)


  35. on October 5, 2010 at 01:03 Alia

    I couldn’t finish this book at all. I really like the concept of throwing Zombies into Pride and Prejudice (who doesn’t love zombie action?) but the characters are so out of character, it’s irritating. Call me a purist if you will… but it’s like this guy took the characters and mixed them up. Rather than Lydia getting irritated at Mary, it’s Elizabeth (and she’s supposed to be more mature). Mind you, I started reading it quite a while ago yet I only got up to Elizabeth walking to Netherfield Park before putting it down. I thought the zombie bits were quite funny but it didn’t flow as well. Well, no harm in trying.


  36. on October 10, 2010 at 08:45 Emma and the Vampires by Jane Austen and Wayne Jospehson: A review « Jane Austen's World

    [...] Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Review of a High Concept Parody [...]


  37. on April 11, 2011 at 08:46 lyn marie cunliffe

    Hi
    I really wanted to like this book ,I loved Jane Slayre,,But I felt that while the co author of Jane Slayre loved the original and was having fun with the text ,,the co author of Pride and prejudice and the Zombies didnt like Jane Austins works and was making fun of them,he seemed to lack affection for the original which I think is essential in the quirk books ,,
    I didnt mind Wickham ending up as he did I felt as he spent his life exploiting his charm and good looks it was poetic justice ,,My daughter especially loved that Lydia ends up paying for her sins by having to look after an invalid as in the book she seems totaly unaware of the near ruin shes brought on her family.I loved that Charlotte became a zombie,,
    I loved the opening lines and some parts of the book such as Lizzies crouching tiger hidden dragon style set to with Lady de bough as you get the impression in the book Lady de bough would just love to give Lizzie a good slap.
    I didnt like most of the treatment that almost all the characters recieve, eg Darcy makes some crude comments which are out of character, the respectable Aunt is given an affair,I felt these spoiled key elements of the original plot and seemed needless


  38. on August 3, 2011 at 15:35 Pride and Prejudice and Zombies « lp1234

    [...] I am not the only fan though… janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/pride-and-prejudice-and-zombies-a-review-of-a-high-concept… [...]


  39. on October 20, 2011 at 22:33 Zombie Lit « Serious Popular Culture?

    [...] commentary on any Austen theme.  Roped into the plot of Austen’s text (according to one estimate, only about 15% of the writing is actually different from the original), Grahame-Smith [...]


  40. on March 25, 2013 at 00:00 Celebrating Pride and Prejudice’s Anniversary, 6 Million Visitors, and a Book Giveaway! | Jane Austen's World

    [...] of many similar books that have been published in recent years; and click here to read my review of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, which began the Jane Austen mash-up craze several years [...]



Comments are closed.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 3,090 other followers

  • Notice: Comments

    Due to SPAMMERS, I will no longer accept comments on posts that I published over 30 days ago. In some instances, I will remove links from comments as well.

    I regret having to take this action.

  • Blog Stats

    • 6,247,386 hits
  • Pin It!

    Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Downton Abbey Season 3 Articles

    untitled

    Click on banner image to see this season's schedule

    SEASON THREE ARTICLES

    ~ Review of Episode 6: Oh, how the mighty have fallen

    ~ Review of Episode 5: The Earl's Gone Off His Rocker and Book Giveaway

    ~ Beauty Lessons Learned from Downton Abbey

    ~ Review of Episode 4: Let the grieving begin '

    ~ Review of Episode 3: Not Enough Noses Out of Joint

    ~ Review of Episode 2: Being Tested Only Makes You Stronger

    ~ Say Yes to the Dress, Episode 2 Poll

    ~ Review of Episode One: The Mouse that Roared

    ~ 1920s Fashions

  • Downton Abbey Season 2 Articles

    Click on the banner to go to PBS Masterpiece Classic

    SEASON TWO ARTICLES

    ~ Watch Downton Abbey Season 2 Online

    ~ Viewers of Downton Abbey Season 2: How Did You Like the Christmas Ending?

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2 Finale:Tonight you're mine completely

    ~ Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey

    ~ The Flu Pandemic in Downton Abbey

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2:Teagowns and Relaxation

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2 Review:Coupling

    ~ Downton Abbey: Preview of Season 2

    ~ The Symbolism of the White Feathers

    ~ World War One Guide to Rats, Shell Shock, and Barbed Wire

    ~ Country houses in medical service

  • Downton Abbey Season One Posts on this blog

    Click on image to enter PBS's site.

    READ THIS BLOG'S ARTICLES ABOUT DOWNTON ABBEY:

    • ~ Watch Downton Abbey Online
    • ~ Downton Abbey: Preview of Season 2
    • ~ Entertaining visitors in an English country house, such as Downton Abbey
    • ~ Downstairs in Downton Abbey: The Servants
    • ~ Upstairs in Downton Abbey: The Three Crawley Sisters
    • ~ The Jane Austen Connection to Downton Abbey and Egypt
    • ~ Downton Abbey's Recycled Costumes
    • ~ Everything You Wanted to Know About the Entail in Downton Abbey, and More
    • ~ The Foxhunt: From Downton Abbey Back to Its Origins
    • ~ The Servants Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • ~ Would You Care for Weak Tea or Strong Tea? How the Dowager Countess of Grantham Served Tea to Her Guests
    • ~ The Duties of a Valet
  • The Obituary of Charlotte Collins by Andrew Capes

    Click on image to read the story.

  • Bookmark

    Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to MySpaceAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter
  • Links to Jane Austen Blogs

    My links page was updated May 2013 and I have removed all the dead links. Topics include Regency fashion, historic foods, Jane Austen societies, British sites, related topics. Click on image.

  • Find Jane Austen on Google

  • Tweet
  • Jane Austen Today, My Other Blog

  • Randolph Macon Talk

    The Marriage Mart
  • This blog has no commercial purpose

    Any ads you see are placed here by Wordpress. I make no profit off my blog. I do receive books and DVDs for review.
  • Jane Austen’s Advice for Writers

    Click on image to read the article.
  • Doctors and Medical Care in the Regency Era

    Click on image.
  • Join Me on Twitter

  • Twitter Updates

    • @delightfulrepas I was appalled at the woman's decision to change her baby's diaper on a dirty floor. What's wrong with her car? #Starbucks 2 days ago
  • Join me on Facebook

    Vic Sanborn

    Create Your Badge
  • Hello, my name is Vic and I live in Richmond, VA. I work in program and professional development at Virginia Commonwealth University, and I have adored Jane Austen almost all of my life. I am a proud lifetime member of the Jane Austen Society of America. This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. I do not accept any form of cash advertising, sponsorship, or paid topic insertions. However, I do accept and keep books, DVDs and CDs to review.

    Contributors to this blog include: Tony Grant and Shelley DeWees.

    If you would like to share a new site, or point out an error, please email me. (Yes, I am fallible. I'll own up to my mistakes and will make the corrections with a polite smile on my face.) Write me at

    Spam protecting image courtesy: Nexodyne.com

    Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.

  • Copyright Statement

    © Vic Sanborn and Jane Austen's World, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Vic Sanborn and Jane Austen's World with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
  • Regency Fashion: Ladies Outerwear and Shawls

    Click on the image.
  • Colors of 19th Century Wedding Dresses

    Click on image

  • Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
  • The Distinctions of Regency Dress: Undress, Half Dress, Full Dress and Their Meaning

    Click on the image to read the article.
  • Recent Posts

    • A Pictorial Visit to Chawton
    • Streaming Jane Austen
    • Pride and Prejudice: Having a Ball at Chawton House
    • Nothing As it Seems – Jane Austen in Bath
    • The College of William and Mary, A Sir Christopher Wren Building in Williamsburg, Virginia?
  • Tags

    Bath Beau Brummell Cassandra Austen Charles Dickens Chawton House Cookery Downton Abbey Downton Abbey Season 3 Elizabeth Bennet embarking on a Course of Study Emma Emma 2009 Georgette Heyer Georgette Heyer Book Reviews Holidays jane austen Jane Austen's family Jane Austen's World jane austen blogs Jane Austen Book review Jane Austen Movies Kate Beckinsale Laurie Viera Rigler London Lori Smith Masterpiece Classic Mr. Darcy PBS Masterpiece Classic PBS Masterpiece Mystery! PBS Movie Adaptation PBS Movie Review Pride and Prejudice Prince Regent Regency Bath Regency Dandy regency dress Regency Fashion Regency food Regency London Regency Servants Regency Transportation Romola Garai SourceBooks Tony Grant Working class
  • Ad Disclaimer

    Any ads that appear on this site were placed there by WordPress. I do not make money off this blog. WordPress keeps the revenue. - Vic
  • Pages

    • AV/E-Texts
      • A Proposal To Cicely, by Georgette Heyer
    • History
    • Icons/Fansites
    • Links
    • Novels
    • Original Sources and 19th C. Texts
    • Podcasts
    • Social Customs During The Regency Era
      • English Culture, 1660-1830
    • Teacher/Student
    • Writer and Literature Resources
  • Petticoats in the Regency Era

    Click on image.
  • Jane Austen’s Writing Desk and Writing Table

    The little round writing table at Chawton.

    Click on image to read this fascinating article.

  • Top Posts

    • Social Customs During The Regency Era
    • A Pictorial Visit to Chawton
    • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
    • Nothing As it Seems - Jane Austen in Bath
    • Progress of a Woman of Pleasure:Prostitutes in 18th Century London
    • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband
    • Pride and Prejudice: Having a Ball at Chawton House
    • Review: Downton Abbey Season 3, Final Episode, or Bloody Hell! Why did Fellowes do it again?
    • Streaming Jane Austen
  • Geo Visitors Map
    Add to Technorati Favorites
    Cultural Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
    Blog Flux Local - Virginia
  • cool hit counter
  • The Animal Rescue Site
  • Archives

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
  • Irresistible Attraction

    An online Regency novel in serialized form. Click here to read a new chapter of Irresistible Attraction each week, and follow the story of Amanda Sinclair and James Cavendish, the Earl of Downsley.
  • My Regency Tea Cup Review Ratings

    • Five Regency tea cups: The book is not perfect (few books are), but it was well worth its purchase and possesses many outstanding qualities that makes it stand head and shoulders above its counterparts.
    • Four Regency tea cups: This book offered many hours of pleasant reading, and I found I could not put it down.
    • Three Regency tea cups: Damned with faint praise. I put the book down often, but was intrigued enough to finish it. In this instance, the movie might be better.
    • Two Regency tea cups: This book required major changes that the author and editor should have fixed before publishing deadline.
    • One Regency tea cup: Oh dear. I do so feel for the trees that sacrificed their lives for this verbal garbage.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,090 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: