• Home
  • AV/E-Texts
  • History
  • Icons/Fansites
  • Links
  • Novels
  • Original Sources and 19th C. Texts
  • Podcasts
  • Social Customs During The Regency Era
  • Teacher/Student
  • Writer and Literature Resources

Jane Austen's World

This Jane Austen blog brings Jane Austen, her novels, and the Regency Period alive through food, dress, social customs, and other 19th C. historical details related to this topic.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Other Reactions to Jane Austen Regrets
Becoming Jane DVD Available Today »

Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband

February 10, 2008 by Vic

A single man of large fortune; four or five thousand a year. What a fine thing for our girls! - Mrs. Bennet on Mr. Bingley’s income, Pride and Prejudice, Volume One, Chapter One

One of the hardest concepts for today’s readers to grasp in Jane Austen’s novels are the economic realities of the times. What do her numbers mean in modern terms? What was the standard of living during the regency era? When Olivia Williams as Jane Austen blurted to her brother Henry in Miss Austen Regrets, “Sense and Sensibility has brought me £140. May I not be proud of that?” – how can we translate that sentence so that it would hold some meaning for us?

A currency converter provided by the National Archives in the U.K. provides a rough idea of what these 1810 figures mean. Further clarification from experts will round out our understanding. Please keep in mind that the sums in the third column of the chart are merely approximations. At this precise time U.S. citizens should multiply these figures by two to derive a dollar amount. I am not an expert, and I will leave more detailed explanations to economists like Brad de Long.

To put some of these sums into perspective, the average annual income for an English laborer or farmer in 1800 was around 15-20 pounds. To live comfortably, an English gentleman like Mr. Bennet, would require around 300 pounds per year per individual, or over fifteen times the amount for a working man who supported his family. As you can see from the figures, as long as Mr. Bennet lived, his family was comfortably off. But the situation would change drastically the moment he died. After that unhappy event, Mrs. Bennet would be expected to live off the 4% interest of her £5,000 marriage settlement, or £200 per year. No wonder she became shrill every time she thought of her unmarried daughters, for Mr. Bennet’s entire yearly £2,000 income and his house were entailed to Mr. Collins. After Mrs. Bennet’s death, Lizzy would receive just 1/5 of her mother’s marriage portion, and she would bring to her marriage only 40 pounds per year.

Today it is hard to accurately determine the spending power of these sums (see the different estimates of Mr. Bingley’s income in the example below). Factors that influence spending power are war, inflation, cost of goods, housing and the geographic area in which the dwellings were located. In any event, Mr. Darcy’s and Mr. Bingley’s incomes would still be regarded as exceedingly fine. In fact, Mr. Darcy’s 10,000 per year represents only 4% interest of his vast fortune. And Mr. Bingley, though he receives only 4,000 per year, inherited almost 3.4 million pounds from his tradesman father in today’s terms.

“…the income would normally come from agricultural profits on land or from other property and investments (in Bingley’s case it turns out the be the latter). It is not easy to translate incomes of the time into today’s money. By some calculations, the effects of inflation mean that a pound in Jane Austen’s time has the same value as almost forty pounds today; if so, Bingley’s income would be the equivalent of 150,000 to 200,000 a year in today’s pounds (or around $250,000-$300,000 in current U.S. money). Altered economic condition, however, make estimates like this tricky: for example, goods tended to be much dearer at that time, in relative terms, while labor tended to be much cheaper. In addition, average incomes in this period, even when adjusted for inflation, were much lower than today, so Bingley’s income represents a far sharper deviation from the prevailing norm than its current equivalent would be.” – Shapard, Annotated Pride and Prejudice, P 5

One can now understand why in Sense and Sensibility Mrs. Dashwood and her daughters were forced to economize. When John Dashwood, under his wife’s influence, reneged on his promise to his dying father to contribute substantial sums of money to his step family, the women were forced to live on 500 pounds per year. This paltry sum would have barely covered their living expenses had it not been for Sir John Middleton’s generosity in inviting his cousin to live in a cottage on his estate.

Like the Dashwood women, Jane Austen, her mother, and sister also experienced chronic money worry. However, through the sale of her books Jane was able to earn a much needed supplemental income. While the £140 she earned from the sales of Sense and Sensibility does not sound like much, it represents close to $9,800 in today’s U.S. sums. In fact, the proceeds from the sale of her four books netted her over 23,000 pounds or around 46,000 dollars towards the end of her life. After her brother Henry’s financial reversals, this money must have been a welcome boon indeed.

Now that you’ve gained some understanding of what these sums of money mean, please read the following statement made by Mrs. Bennet in Volume 3 of Pride and Prejudice, Chapter 17:

Dear, dear Lizzy. A house in town! Every thing that is charming! Three daughters married! Ten thousand a year! Oh, Lord! What will become of me. I shall go distracted.

How much does ten thousand a year in 1810 represent?
a) £339, 600
b) $680,000
c) A princely sum
d) In relative terms, all of the above

Georgianna Darcy’s marriage portion is 30,000. How much annual income would this sum derive?

a) £3,000
b) £12,000
c) £1,200
d) £120
Sources and resources:

  • Update: How Wealthy is Mr. Darcy Really? Pounds and Dollars in the World of Pride and Prejudice, James Heldman, JASNA
  • Read my other post on the topic: In Jane Austen’s Own Words: Economic Sense and Sensibility
  • Inflation and contemporary Equivalents to English Money
  • Jane Austen Economics, 20 p. PDF document
  • Crowns, Pounds and Guineas: A Quick Guide To British Currency: by Ellen Micheletti
  • Currency Converter, and British Buying Power
  • Understanding the Society in Which Jane Austen Sets Pride and Prejudice, Pamela Whalan, JASNA, 2002
  • The people in Jane Austen’s life: The quintessential Georgian parents: George & Cassandra Austen, Michael Griffin, JASA, 2007
  • Shapard, David M., The Annotated Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen, Anchor Books, 2004
*References, Acknowledgements, Links, and Abbreviations, For the Male Voices Web Site
**Literary Study Tour: Jane Austen, 1998
***Ian Littlewood, Jane Austen: A Critical Assessment, p 205, 1998

Addendum:

To learn more about the ‘Cost of Living in Jane Austen’s England: Vulgar Economy’, click here . This article from the Jane Austen Centre goes into further detail about the Mrs. and Misses Dashwoods’ economic situation.

About these ads

Share with others:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Film adaptation, jane austen, Money in Regency, Mr. Bingley, Mr. Darcy's income, Netherfield, Pride & Prejudice 1995, Regency World | Tagged British Inheritance Laws, Cost of Living in Regency England, Elizabeth Bennet, Fitzwilliam Darcy, jane austen blogs, Masterpiece Classic, Mr. Darcy, Mr. Darcy's Wealth, Pride and Prejudice, Regency Finance, The Bennets, The Complete Jane Austen | 38 Comments

38 Responses

  1. on February 10, 2008 at 14:05 laura

    Excellent and nicely researched post. I never understood that “a year” part of the whole deal, but not it’s a bit clearer. Thanks!


  2. on February 10, 2008 at 23:51 Arti

    What an in-depth investigation into the world of P&P! Great preparation for viewers to get ready for Sunday’s PBS showing. Understanding the background can certainly helps one to empathize with the anxiety and agitation of Mrs. Bennet, and at the same time, repect and admire more of Elizabeth’s secure self-image and confidence in her own choice and determination in rejecting initially one of the richest man her family has ever known or will ever encounter!


  3. on February 11, 2008 at 00:58 gettingpurlywithit

    Hello, I stumbled upon your blog while googling “knitted reticules”.

    I am glad I found your blog, thanks for your thorough work!


  4. on February 11, 2008 at 01:35 BML

    Excellent to know the equivalent value of money then and now…I would never have thought that £140 would have represented so much!


  5. on February 11, 2008 at 15:06 Kaye Dacus

    I had read in an essay in the Oxford Companion to Jane Austen when trying to estimate the values in modern terms, to multiply the sum by 50. According to this chart (and because that essay was written at least ten years ago), I’m under-estimating the U.S. equivalent by about 5-10% when I do that, but it still gives a good (round) ballpark number.

    Ah, inflation!


  6. on February 11, 2008 at 20:47 Laurel Ann

    Ms. Place, what an excellent explanation on Regency monetary values! Wow, so much research! Great job. Cheers, Laurel Ann


  7. on February 12, 2008 at 00:49 eric3000

    Such an interesting subject! This information is very helpful! It’s still a little hard to completely grasp, though, because I think of a couple hundred thousand pounds a year as being very well off but certainly not excessively rich. But our lives are so different now that our views of what makes someone wealthy have changed.

    It’s funny to think about how it would be very expensive to buy a new dress but relatively cheap to hire a lady’s maid to help you put it on. So a Mr. Darcy, for instance, probably didn’t buy as much “stuff” as we buy today but, of course, had scores of servants that we could never afford.

    And the property also complicates our understanding because that’s somewhat separate from the income, although, obviously some of the income might come from the property. But the point is that Mr. Darcy didn’t have to use any of his income to buy a house as most people have to do today.

    I think it’s also hard to grasp that this was sort of a guaranteed income that could in some cases be supplemented so we can’t compare it directly to a salary. I never had a trust fund so this is a foreign concept to me.

    Anyway, thanks for providing this usefull post!


  8. on February 13, 2008 at 15:45 Jacqueline T Lynch

    Excellent post on what is actually the heart of the matter in Austen’s novels. One wonders whether this information should be printed on the flyleaf of all her novels for the benefit of young readers who don’t get why all this marrying of rich husbands is important.


  9. on February 15, 2008 at 01:12 Kent

    A more useful measure might be to express it in terms of average per capita GDP, since that will tell you where the Darcys, Bingleys and Bennets stood in relation to the average British subject at the time.

    I’ve heard that the average per capita income around 1800 was something in the neighborhood of 25 pounds. Today it is about 80 times that much, or about 20,000 pounds. So a man with 10,000 per year back then compares to the average person like a man today with 8 million per year, and the Bennets’ 2,000 per year is the equivalent of over 1.5 million per year.

    Just food for thought.


  10. on February 15, 2008 at 05:35 Fun Friday–Price & Prejudice (Part 2) « KayeDacus.com

    [...] *Click here for more details on calculating Austenian currency into today’s [...]


  11. on June 9, 2008 at 06:50 In Jane Austen’s Own Words: Economic Sense and Sensibility « Jane Austen’s World

    [...] For a fuller explanation of incomes during the Regency era and their relative value today, click on my other post, Pride and Prejudice Economics. [...]


  12. on June 11, 2008 at 09:52 Cost of Living in Georgian and Regency England « Jane Austen’s World

    [...] to be, as you’ll discover on the following sites. For fuller explanations on this blog, go to Pride and Prejudice Economics and In Jane Austen’s Own Words: Economic Sense and [...]


  13. on August 1, 2008 at 01:33 zo

    I think a better way to calculate is by using a proxy economy of a present day third world country to reflect buying habits.
    This modelling using Adjusted Exchange Rate, Relative Income, Household Purchase Basket. etc would give a more accurate measure of the purchasing power and value of JA characters’ income..
    MY calculation using a proxy economy puts Mr Bennet income of £2,000 as equivalent to (Pound Sterling) £156,000 today….the income of a well-to-do person in the UK…
    Mr Darcy £10,000 = £ 780,000, a very, very rich man in our today society…..These are income of people in the top 0.04% of today society, (These two characters, i believe were also in that top bracket)
    Mrs Dashwood and her 3 daughter would be surviving on £40,000, which in england would be comfortable , but not luxury living…

    ( i am happy to discuss these calculation with anyone interested)


  14. on October 8, 2008 at 06:30 The trouble with Pride and prejudice? It's too short! | Moving To Andalusia

    [...] Why a single man with four thousand a year is desirable husband A Jane Austen currency converter. It actually gives a certain depth to the story when you iunderstand that though Lizzy and her family were comfortable while her father was still alive, but really left with a pittance once he died. It makes the whole saying no to mr. Collins-business a lot more poignant. Reckless even! She’s actually being very undaughterly to her family, who’d be out on the street once papa Bennett dies. It also makes Charlotte Lucas, who I always liked, the normal one. [...]


  15. on July 15, 2009 at 00:27 How Rich is Fitzwilliam Darcy? Very « Jane Austen’s World

    [...] Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable… [...]


  16. on August 20, 2009 at 13:15 How Rich is Mr. Darcy? | keethink.com

    [...] article, which pegs Darcy’s annual (adjusted) income as about $300,000/year, plus this article, which refers to the fact that Darcy’s annual income represents 4%-5% of his actual wealth, [...]


  17. on October 11, 2009 at 18:22 Kit

    Thank you very much for your very informative article. I have been wondering about how it all translated into today’s standards and you have put it down exceedingly well. For all Mrs Bennet’s worrying I can now understand!


  18. on October 12, 2009 at 18:16 Margarette

    Thank you so much for your work on this entry! I teach Austen, and while I have a pretty good idea of the values, your column makes it so I can say, “Go see this wonderful blog.” Boom! Done! A boon for lazy professors. Brava!


  19. on February 26, 2010 at 23:22 Liz

    The posession or buying of an estate is also an important consideration in the relative value of the income. In Bingley’s case his sisters want him to do so. It not only indicates status in society but gives back ground rents from tenants as well as produce.
    Probably an owner who appears to have as much land as Mr Darcy, has a property which is bringing in a substantial income not only from rents but timber, crops etc. I think the value of the income comparing then to now is more complex than the chart indicates.
    The fact that Mrs.Dashwood and her daughters are able to get housing from her cousin make it possible for them to live the lives of gentlewomen, allowing her to keep some servants. Sir William Lucas is able to buy an estate and raise and educate a large family from the proceeds of a shop in a small town (we don’t if he sold the shop outright or if he has it managed for him by others) is something that gives a comparable that I don’t think would be possible today.


  20. on May 25, 2010 at 11:53 10,000 pounds a year… « The Bennet Sisters

    [...] between the 600,000 pounds and 750,000 pound bracket, however JaneAustensWorld’s post ‘Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a De… provides a very convincing case that 10,000 pounds is nearer the 300,000 [...]


  21. on September 8, 2010 at 17:45 vince caruso

    Prompted by the unlikelihood of the Dashwoods surviving on 16,980 pounds, I looked up the site mentioned:

    The disclaimer on the website from which the conversions are draw says: the results of the calculations are intended to be a general guide to historic values, rather than a categorical statement of fact.

    So I turned to the site I used while writing a 1918 screenplay: http://www.measuringworth.com, which is shown, not as a ‘maybe’ but an actually conversion.

    The Dashwood’s yearly income of 500 would actually translate to 28,200 (a far more believeable income for “Gentleman’s daughters”).

    Using this more accurate converter, Darcy’s income would be 565,000


  22. on November 5, 2010 at 08:02 Amii

    This site has been very, very helpful to me! And, I’m just blown away at how much money that IS! *Faints*

    The reasons behind me using the information here are as follows: I have an English study on “Pride and Prejudice” and “Letters to Alice on first reading Jane Austen” and the assessment is based on three paradigms (or, ways of thinking) in context to the 19th Century, the 1980′s (Alice’s time frame in England) and today. If, anyone could tell me what the basic wage was in pounds during the 1980′s I would be ever so grateful.

    Thank you for the wonderful information!


  23. on December 15, 2010 at 08:55 Live the Jane Austen legend at ‘Netherfield Park’ | Prime UK

    [...] who Elisabeth Bennet marvels at in Pride and Prejudice for his £4,000-a-year salary which, in today’s money, would be £135,000 a year. The difference was, in his day that bought him the whole [...]


  24. on April 9, 2011 at 17:33 Austenfan

    Actually, Georgiana Darcy would not be receiving 30,000 pounds a year, but rather would receive one lump sum totalling 30,000 pounds upon the occasion of her marriage, provided that Mr. Darcy approved her choice. Nevertheless, the interest from this sum would allow her 1,500 pounds per year, which would be added to whatever income her husband had of his own (because naturally she would marry a gentleman of independent means).


    • on April 10, 2011 at 12:59 Vic

      You are absolutely right. I mentioned that it was a marriage portion, but I wrote the question incorrectly. I have fixed it. Thank you. In terms of yearly income, I have gone with more conservative estimates from other sources, which includes the sum you mentioned.


  25. on April 15, 2011 at 02:42 Connections Redux by Harvey S. | Gioia Recs…

    [...] Finally, for a better understanding of the finances in Pride & Prejudice and this fanfic as compared to modern economics, Click Here. [...]


  26. on May 1, 2011 at 10:46 smartcookiemedia

    Wonderfully researched post. Really clarified a lot for me as I’m watching Pride and Prejudice now…


  27. on October 3, 2011 at 04:50 Mr. Darcy

    I think i’ve now seen the movie P&P a hundred times, as well as the other Jane Austen novels! Many people don’t realize how hard it was for women back then and that marriage and money were life and death. Always wondered about the money difference from 1810 to 2011 exchange rate and appreciate this great post.
    I wish there were more of the wonderful manners lost of that period in todays time*


  28. on December 16, 2011 at 13:53 Diana Peterfreund Blog | Happy Birthday, Jane!

    [...] an in-depth analysis of Austenian fortunes, see this great post, which attempts to explain the way money worked in the time, complete with a lovely chart, [...]


  29. on June 7, 2012 at 22:05 Accessing Austen: How Rich Was Mr. Darcy?

    [...] sound like much of a fortune. The wonderful blog Jane Austen’s World has a post, “Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Pounds Per Year is a De…,” which describes several monetary references in Austen’s novels and letters in modern [...]


  30. on July 25, 2012 at 15:48 drush76

    ["Sir William Lucas is able to buy an estate and raise and educate a large family from the proceeds of a shop in a small town (we don’t if he sold the shop outright or if he has it managed for him by others) is something that gives a comparable that I don’t think would be possible today."]

    Chances are Sir William sold that shop. He would need to do that and purchase an estate in order to be viewed as a member of the upper-classes. Bingley has to do the same – sell off his factory and purchase an estate.


  31. on August 9, 2012 at 16:14 Sylvia M.

    Did the daughters always just get whatever dowry the mother had upon her marriage? I see that the Bennett girls only received their mother’s portion divided up among them. Is Georgiana Darcy’s 30,000 pounds the amount of money that her mother received upon her marriage? If Georgiana had sisters would they have each received money from their father or would their mother’s marriage money have been divided up among them?


  32. on February 13, 2013 at 12:10 Jane Freeman

    Where can I find the same kind of information about Jane Eyre? Mr. Rochester is worth 20,000 pounds – what does that mean? is that just the yearly interest on his estate? If Jane earns 30 pounds per annum as a governness, what does that translate into, in dollars, in today’s market?Many thanks.


  33. on February 18, 2013 at 08:18 living walls

    You can certainly see your enthusiasm in the article you write.
    The arena hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time follow your heart.


  34. on April 24, 2013 at 17:33 Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband | All about books

    [...] Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable…. [...]


  35. on April 24, 2013 at 17:39 Social Rank in Pride and Prejudice | All about books

    [...] Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable… [...]


  36. on April 26, 2013 at 15:15 Social Rank in Pride and Prejudice | All about books

    [...] Jane Austen’s World. Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable… [...]


  37. on May 3, 2013 at 22:15 Jane Austen. Who? – Part 3 | Tea in a Teacup

    [...] Pride and Prejudice Economics – by Jane Austen’s World [...]



Comments are closed.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 3,185 other followers

  • Notice: Comments

    Due to SPAMMERS, I will no longer accept comments on posts that I published over 30 days ago. In some instances, I will remove links from comments as well.

    I regret having to take this action.

  • Blog Stats

    • 6,333,642 hits
  • Pin It!

    Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Downton Abbey Season 3 Articles

    untitled

    Click on banner image to see this season's schedule

    SEASON THREE ARTICLES

    ~ Review of Episode 6: Oh, how the mighty have fallen

    ~ Review of Episode 5: The Earl's Gone Off His Rocker and Book Giveaway

    ~ Beauty Lessons Learned from Downton Abbey

    ~ Review of Episode 4: Let the grieving begin '

    ~ Review of Episode 3: Not Enough Noses Out of Joint

    ~ Review of Episode 2: Being Tested Only Makes You Stronger

    ~ Say Yes to the Dress, Episode 2 Poll

    ~ Review of Episode One: The Mouse that Roared

    ~ 1920s Fashions

  • Downton Abbey Season 2 Articles

    Click on the banner to go to PBS Masterpiece Classic

    SEASON TWO ARTICLES

    ~ Watch Downton Abbey Season 2 Online

    ~ Viewers of Downton Abbey Season 2: How Did You Like the Christmas Ending?

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2 Finale:Tonight you're mine completely

    ~ Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey

    ~ The Flu Pandemic in Downton Abbey

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2:Teagowns and Relaxation

    ~ Downton Abbey Season 2 Review:Coupling

    ~ Downton Abbey: Preview of Season 2

    ~ The Symbolism of the White Feathers

    ~ World War One Guide to Rats, Shell Shock, and Barbed Wire

    ~ Country houses in medical service

  • Downton Abbey Season One Posts on this blog

    Click on image to enter PBS's site.

    READ THIS BLOG'S ARTICLES ABOUT DOWNTON ABBEY:

    • ~ Watch Downton Abbey Online
    • ~ Downton Abbey: Preview of Season 2
    • ~ Entertaining visitors in an English country house, such as Downton Abbey
    • ~ Downstairs in Downton Abbey: The Servants
    • ~ Upstairs in Downton Abbey: The Three Crawley Sisters
    • ~ The Jane Austen Connection to Downton Abbey and Egypt
    • ~ Downton Abbey's Recycled Costumes
    • ~ Everything You Wanted to Know About the Entail in Downton Abbey, and More
    • ~ The Foxhunt: From Downton Abbey Back to Its Origins
    • ~ The Servants Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • ~ Would You Care for Weak Tea or Strong Tea? How the Dowager Countess of Grantham Served Tea to Her Guests
    • ~ The Duties of a Valet
  • The Obituary of Charlotte Collins by Andrew Capes

    Click on image to read the story.

  • Bookmark

    Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to FaceBookAdd to Google BookmarkAdd to MySpaceAdd to NewsvineAdd to RedditAdd to StumbleUponAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Twitter
  • Links to Jane Austen Blogs

    My links page was updated May 2013 and I have removed all the dead links. Topics include Regency fashion, historic foods, Jane Austen societies, British sites, related topics. Click on image.

  • Find Jane Austen on Google

  • Tweet
  • Jane Austen Today, My Other Blog

  • Randolph Macon Talk

    The Marriage Mart
  • This blog has no commercial purpose

    Any ads you see are placed here by Wordpress. I make no profit off my blog. I do receive books and DVDs for review.
  • Jane Austen’s Advice for Writers

    Click on image to read the article.
  • Doctors and Medical Care in the Regency Era

    Click on image.
  • Join Me on Twitter

  • Twitter Updates

    • Winner of #TheVoice (no surprise) is Danielle. (So Safe.) #VoiceWinner 1 day ago
  • Join me on Facebook

    Vic Sanborn

    Create Your Badge
  • Hello, my name is Vic and I live in Richmond, VA. I work in program and professional development at Virginia Commonwealth University, and I have adored Jane Austen almost all of my life. I am a proud lifetime member of the Jane Austen Society of America. This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. I do not accept any form of cash advertising, sponsorship, or paid topic insertions. However, I do accept and keep books, DVDs and CDs to review.

    Contributors to this blog include: Tony Grant and Shelley DeWees.

    If you would like to share a new site, or point out an error, please email me. (Yes, I am fallible. I'll own up to my mistakes and will make the corrections with a polite smile on my face.) Write me at

    Spam protecting image courtesy: Nexodyne.com

    Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.

  • Copyright Statement

    © Vic Sanborn and Jane Austen's World, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Vic Sanborn and Jane Austen's World with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
  • Regency Fashion: Ladies Outerwear and Shawls

    Click on the image.
  • Colors of 19th Century Wedding Dresses

    Click on image

  • Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
  • The Distinctions of Regency Dress: Undress, Half Dress, Full Dress and Their Meaning

    Click on the image to read the article.
  • Recent Posts

    • Regency Image: Painting of Queen Hortense by Antoine-Jean Duclaux
    • Progression of Regency Fashion in Jane Austen’s Adult Life
    • Retelling Jane Austen
    • A Drive Through Steventon to St. Nicholas Church
    • Book Give Away: The List Lover’s Guide to Jane Austen by Joan Strasbaugh
  • Tags

    Bath Beau Brummell book giveaway Cassandra Austen Charles Dickens Chawton Cottage Chawton House Cookery Downton Abbey Downton Abbey Season 3 Elizabeth Bennet embarking on a Course of Study Emma Emma 2009 Georgette Heyer Georgette Heyer Book Reviews Holidays jane austen Jane Austen's World jane austen blogs Jane Austen Book review Jane Austen Movies Kate Beckinsale London Lori Smith Masterpiece Classic Mr. Darcy PBS Masterpiece Classic PBS Masterpiece Mystery! PBS Movie Adaptation PBS Movie Review Pride and Prejudice Prince Regent Regency Bath Regency Dandy regency dress Regency Fashion Regency food Regency London Regency Servants Regency Transportation Romola Garai SourceBooks Tony Grant Working class
  • Ad Disclaimer

    Any ads that appear on this site were placed there by WordPress. I do not make money off this blog. WordPress keeps the revenue. - Vic
  • Pages

    • AV/E-Texts
      • A Proposal To Cicely, by Georgette Heyer
    • History
    • Icons/Fansites
    • Links
    • Novels
    • Original Sources and 19th C. Texts
    • Podcasts
    • Social Customs During The Regency Era
      • English Culture, 1660-1830
    • Teacher/Student
    • Writer and Literature Resources
  • Petticoats in the Regency Era

    Click on image.
  • Jane Austen’s Writing Desk and Writing Table

    The little round writing table at Chawton.

    Click on image to read this fascinating article.

  • Top Posts

    • Regency Image: Painting of Queen Hortense by Antoine-Jean Duclaux
    • Social Customs During The Regency Era
    • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
    • Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband
    • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
    • Progression of Regency Fashion in Jane Austen's Adult Life
    • An 18th Century Lady's Toilette: Hours of Leisurely Dressing and Private Affairs
    • Everything You Wanted to Know About the Entail in Downton Abbey, and More
    • Podcasts
  • Geo Visitors Map Add to Technorati Favorites Cultural Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory Blog Flux Local - Virginia
  • cool hit counter
  • The Animal Rescue Site
  • Archives

    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
  • Irresistible Attraction

    An online Regency novel in serialized form. Click here to read a new chapter of Irresistible Attraction each week, and follow the story of Amanda Sinclair and James Cavendish, the Earl of Downsley.
  • My Regency Tea Cup Review Ratings

    • Five Regency tea cups: The book is not perfect (few books are), but it was well worth its purchase and possesses many outstanding qualities that makes it stand head and shoulders above its counterparts.
    • Four Regency tea cups: This book offered many hours of pleasant reading, and I found I could not put it down.
    • Three Regency tea cups: Damned with faint praise. I put the book down often, but was intrigued enough to finish it. In this instance, the movie might be better.
    • Two Regency tea cups: This book required major changes that the author and editor should have fixed before publishing deadline.
    • One Regency tea cup: Oh dear. I do so feel for the trees that sacrificed their lives for this verbal garbage.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,185 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: